Evaluation of Synthetic Osteochondral Implants

Abstract

This translational animal model study was designed to assess function, bone ingrowth and integration, and joint pathology associated with two different synthetic, bilayered osteochondral implants over a 3-month period after implantation into the femoral condyles of dogs. SynACart-Titanium (n = 6) and SynACart-PEEK (n = 6) (Arthrex, Naples, FL, and Sites Medical, Columbia City, IN) implants were press-fit into the lateral or medial femoral condyle (alternating location) of purpose-bred adult research dogs. Dogs were humanely euthanized 3 months after surgery and the operated knees were assessed radiographically, arthroscopically, grossly, and histologically. Based on all assessments, both types of implants were well tolerated and safe with no evidence for infection, migration, or rejection. Half of the SynACart-PEEK implants showed radiographic and histologic evidence of poor incorporation with all of these being in the lateral femoral condyle. SynACart-Titanium implants were considered effective in terms of integration into bone, lack of damage to surrounding and apposing articular cartilage, and maintenance of implant integrity and architecture for the duration of the study.

Keywords

knee - osteochondral - dog - femoral condyle - synthetic

• References

• 1 Heir S, Nerhus TK, Røtterud JH , et al. Focal cartilage defects in the knee impair quality of life as much as severe osteoarthritis: a comparison of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in 4 patient categories scheduled for knee surgery. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (2) 231-237
• 2 Gomoll AH. Microfracture and augments. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (1) 9-15
• 3 Kon E, Filardo G, Di Martino A, Marcacci M. ACI and MACI. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (1) 17-22
• 4 Farr J, Cole BJ, Sherman S, Karas V. Particulated articular cartilage: CAIS and DeNovo NT. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (1) 23-29
• 5 Dhollander AA, Guevara Sánchez VR, Almqvist KF, Verdonk R, Verbruggen G, Verdonk PC. The use of scaffolds in the treatment of osteochondral lesions in the knee: current concepts and future trends. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (3) 179-186
• 6 McCoy B, Miniaci A. Osteochondral autograft transplantation/mosaicplasty. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (2) 99-108
• 7 Bugbee W, Cavallo M, Giannini S. Osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (2) 109-116
• 8 O'Connell GD, Lima EG, Bian L , et al. Toward engineering a biological joint replacement. J Knee Surg 2012; 25 (3) 187-196
• 9 Dalldorf PG, Banas MP, Hicks DG, Pellegrini Jr VD. Rate of degeneration of human acetabular cartilage after hemiarthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77 (6) 877-882
• 10 Rees JL, Dawson J, Hand GC , et al. The use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient satisfaction ratings to assess outcome in hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92 (8) 1107-1111
• 11 Bollars P, Bosquet M, Vandekerckhove B, Hardeman F, Bellemans J. Prosthetic inlay resurfacing for the treatment of focal, full thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle: a bridge between biologics and conventional arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (9) 1753-1759
• 12 Becher C, Kalbe C, Thermann H , et al. Minimum 5-year results of focal articular prosthetic resurfacing for the treatment of full-thickness articular cartilage defects in the knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131 (8) 1135-1143
• 13 Oka M, Chang Y-S, Nakamura T, Ushio K, Toguchida J, Gu H-O. Synthetic osteochondral replacement of the femoral articular surface. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79 (6) 1003-1007
• 14 Mahn MM, Cook JL, Cook CR, Balke MT. Arthroscopic verification of ultrasonographic diagnosis of meniscal pathology in dogs. Vet Surg 2005; 34 (4) 318-323
• 15 Cook JL, Kuroki K, Visco D, Pelletier J-P, Schulz L, Lafeber FP. The OARSI histopathology initiative—recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the dog. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18 (Suppl. 03) S66-S79
• 16 Custers RJ, Saris DB, Dhert WJ , et al. Articular cartilage degeneration following the treatment of focal cartilage defects with ceramic metal implants and compared with microfracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (4) 900-910
• 17 Custers RJ, Creemers LB, van Rijen MHP, Verbout AJ, Saris DBF, Dhert WJA. Cartilage damage caused by metal implants applied for the treatment of established localized cartilage defects in a rabbit model. J Orthop Res 2009; 27 (1) 84-90
• 18 Kirker-Head CA, Van Sickle DC, Ek SW, McCool JC. Safety of, and biological and functional response to, a novel metallic implant for the management of focal full-thickness cartilage defects: preliminary assessment in an animal model out to 1 year. J Orthop Res 2006; 24 (5) 1095-1108
• 19 Khan I, Smith N, Jones E, Finch DS, Cameron RE. Analysis and evaluation of a biomedical polycarbonate urethane tested in an in vitro study and an ovine arthroplasty model. Part I: materials selection and evaluation. Biomaterials 2005; 26 (6) 621-631
• 20 Khan I, Smith N, Jones E, Finch DS, Cameron RE. Analysis and evaluation of a biomedical polycarbonate urethane tested in an in vitro study and an ovine arthroplasty model. Part II: in vivo investigation. Biomaterials 2005; 26 (6) 633-643
• 21 Kurtz SM, Siskey R, Reitman M. Accelerated aging, natural aging, and small punch testing of gamma-air sterilized polycarbonate urethane acetabular components. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 93 (2) 442-447